Understand the AI risks in your business workflows

Practical reviews of AI-enabled workflows, governance and suppliers. We agree the scope, review the evidence and give you written findings and clear next steps.

Discuss an AI security review Compare services and prices

A first step at a fixed fee

Defenders' Window Assessment — £495 + VAT for one agreed AI-enabled workflow. Human-reviewed findings and an evidence pack within the agreed review scope.

See the £495 assessment

Published turnaround for the assessment is 72 hours from accepted inputs. Every engagement has a written scope and stated limits; framework mapping is informational — not accredited certification or legal advice.

TitleAI Decision Sprint — Cover Sheet

DrawnRanj

Checked(illustrative)

Sheet1 of 1

RevC · Sep 2026

Led by Ranjeet Rana, whose career includes 18+ years in technology programme delivery. View credentials and evidence. The cover-sheet drawing above is an illustrative example, not a client sign-off.

Note 2 — choose

Choose the question you need answered

One known AI workflow needs a security reviewDefenders' Window Assessment · £495 +VAT
One team needs to map AI use across up to three workflowsAI Usage & Governance Discovery Sprint · £2,500 +VAT
Your team needs practical AI-use rulesAI Governance Starter Pack · £495–£750 +VAT
You are assessing an AI supplierAI Vendor Due-Diligence Review · £750–£995 +VAT
A sponsor needs a pilot, change, pause or stop decisionWorkflow Decision Sprint · £2,950 / £3,500 +VAT

Specialist law-firm reviews, workshops, delivery support and ongoing reviews are also available — each service can be discussed on its own. Sprint fee: £2,950 + VAT for a warm introduction; £3,500 + VAT for a new or regulated buyer. The applicable fee is confirmed in writing before booking.

Note 3 — the sprint, in detail

One workflow. Ten working days. A decision you can defend.

The Decision Sprint maps one live process, screens the data and operational risks, ranks three options, and ends in a sponsor meeting with a signed decision: pilot, change, pause — or stop.

What lands on your desk

Current-state workflow mapA3 + notes
Risk & data-handling note (UK GDPR-aware)written
Three ranked options, with rationaleranked
Acceptance criteria & human-review designper option
30-day pilot brief — only if justifiedconditional
Sponsor decision meeting45 min

Terms, plainly

Fee (warm introduction)£2,950 +VAT
Fee (new or regulated buyer)£3,500 +VAT
To reserve the window50%
Elapsed time, scope accepted10 days
Consultant-days, capped4–5
“Stop” counts assuccess

Effort is capped on our side, not yours ballooning. If your situation needs more than one Sprint, that is a second scoped decision — never scope creep on the first.

Note 4 — schedule of products

From a first look to governed delivery.

Item	Description	Fee
Defenders' Window Assessment	One workflow, one 72-hour security posture check. Human-reviewed findings, written scope, evidence pack you can hand to a board. The smallest credible first step — and the demo behind every proposal we write.	£495 +VAT72 hours · 100% upfront
Practical Claude Workshop	A half-day working session for leadership and operations teams: safe use on your real workflows, governance basics, no slides-for-slides. Independent training — not an authorised Anthropic course, and we say so.	£1,250 +VAThalf day · 50% to book
Delivery & partner days	Programme governance, PMO and AI-adoption delivery inside your transformation — direct, or through your delivery partner.	£550 +VAT/day via delivery partners · £650 +VAT/day directper day · 14-day terms

Continuous monitoring, governance packs, vendor due-diligence and law-firm audits are listed in Services.

Note 5 — why believe us

Evidence, stated with its limits.

CertifiedRanjeet holds Claude Certified Architect — Foundations and Claude Certified Associate — Foundations credentials issued by Anthropic (individual qualifications; the workshop is independently delivered). Verify Ranj's individual credentials — links, never score reports or candidate IDs.

Experience18+ years in technology programme delivery, with earlier career roles at Travelport, Fidelity, Lloyds, BT and Barclays. These describe prior career experience — not Secure Wireless AI client engagements or endorsements.

ResearchOur internal lab research explores AI-security risks and review methods. Results depend on the models, test conditions and evaluation method used; internal experiments are not evidence of performance in a customer deployment. Framework mappings (NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001) are informational — not certification.

General note

We would rather lose a sale than inflate lab evidence into a client claim. If a diagnostic says “don't build”, that is what you receive — in writing.

The full record →

Note 6 — start

Name one workflow. Get a straight answer within a working day.

The fastest start costs nothing: send the name of one process that is eating time or creating risk. We will tell you plainly whether the Sprint, the £495 assessment — or honestly, nothing — is the right next step.

Send the workflow name →